I Got a bang out of You: Twitmyer's Discovery of

Did you know that the knee jerk (patellar reflex) can be triggered without anything touching the knee?
< img width ="1024"height ="538" src="https://i0.wp.com/eileenanddogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/reflex-hammer-1024x538.jpeg?resize=1024%2C538&ssl=1" alt="A reflex

hammer such as a physician uses. The head is triangular and aqua colored and the deal with is silver-colored metal “/ > Reflex hammer Pavlov was scooped, however nobody noticed. Many people have actually heard of Ivan Pavlov and his dogs, and many understand the specifics of his discovery. He inadvertently conditioned pet dogs to drool at the sound of a buzzer, recognized what he had done, and checked out a few of the extensive implications. However hardly anybody understands that at the very same time, the American Edwin Twitmyer likewise discovered the conditioned action. His discovery included a different reflex but was similarly unintentional. His research study was published in 1902 — a year before Pavlov’s. This is the story of his discovery and the underwhelming response it got.

Studying the Knee Jerk

Edwin Twitmyer, a graduate student in psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, chose to study the human patellar reflex for his doctoral research. By 1900, physiologists understood that there was a great deal of variation in the knee jerk reaction in between topics and even in between responses by the very same person. Warren Lombard had determined variations in the knee jerk having to do with time of day, temperature level, and barometric pressure (Lombard, 1887). The doctor Ernő Jendrassik found a creative way to prevent the attempts of clients to game the reflexive action when the patellar tendon was tapped (Zehr & Stein, 1999).

Twitmyer set out to tape-record several observations of the knee jerk under controlled conditions and to specify and codify the responses. He kept in mind that “when the patella tendons are struck at exactly the very same location with blows of consistent force and at regular intervals, no 2 of the resulting knee jerks are of the same level” (Twitmyer, 1902, p. 8). He wished to find out if he could draw conclusions about the variation in the actions and come up with an affordable definition of a normal range.

Twitmyer had access to a swimming pool of research study subjects: other psychology trainees. He recruited 17 males and started his research. He studied the knee jerk under both “normal” conditions and with numerous adjustments. He managed for the variables that Lombard had actually found.

So, where did this variation in reactions originated from, how far did it generally extend, and just how much variation would there be if they kept knocking and knocking and knocking on the subjects’ knees for prolonged periods? Would there be discoverable patterns? Variations that were predictable through the individuals’ physiology?

Twitmyer and his pet dogs Twitmyer likewise hoped to find proof regarding whether the knee jerk was a true reflex, a mechanical response to unexpected pressure on the patellar tendon, or a mix of the 2. He conjectured it was the last of these, and he was correct. The hammer tap extends the quadriceps muscles in the thigh. This extending sets off a monosynaptic reflex. The message is sent to the spinal cord, and a return message triggers the quadriceps to contract. When the leg is hanging totally free, this triggers the leg to kick.

The purpose of the patellar reflex is not to kick physicians. In normal life, when our feet are on the ground, the patellar reflex assists us balance. That it can be activated when we are sitting with legs swinging free is a fluke.

Pet dogs and numerous other animals have the patellar reflex, too.

Developing Consistent Stimuli and Measurement Systems

Twitmyer established a mechanical pendulum system in his laboratory so that the tap of the hammers on the patellar tendons would be uniform. In the majority of experiments, both knees were tapped simultaneously. There was an automatic warning bell that cautioned the subject to prepare for the hammer taps. (Do you see what’s coming?)

Twitmyer established a mechanical approach of determining the extent of the kicks as well. There were strings connected to both of the topics’ feet, and these were connected via a sheave to a device that somewhat resembled an analog seismograph with its turning roll of paper and moving pen. Twitmyer noted that the friction of the pens on the paper and the balancing weight on the pulley were lessened, so the resistance added to the kick was negligible.

Twitmyer’s experiment Twitmyer kept data on all the

reactions of the topics, consisting of one subject who had no response to the tapping hammer at all, ever. Today we would question whether this student had a neurological problem. He found throughout 60 experiments that the typical knee jerk of his topics varied from 0– 165 mm, and concluded that it was not actually possible to appoint a “typical”variety of movement to it. He examined the topics ‘knee physiology to figure out if there were a relationship in between it and the degree of the kick and might find no correlation. Ditto for muscle tone. He conjectured that the distinctions in kick magnitude were most likely due more to the “irritation or conductivity, or both, of the nervous structures involved in the knee jerk mechanism” (Twitmyer, 1974, p. 1055). He likewise studied the swing of the leg after the reflexive kick.

Which would have been the level of it, other than one day the bell called without the hammer tap. It so took place that a subject with an extremely robust kicking reflex was sitting in the apparatus. He kicked. Twitmyer’s discovery of participant conditioning, like Pavlov’s, was an accident.

Getting a Kick

Here’s how Twitmyer described the incident in his lab and his interest about it:

Throughout the change of the device for an earlier group of explores one subject (Topic A) a decided kick of both legs was observed to follow a tap of the signal bell taking place without the normal blow of the hammers on the tendons. It was at first thought that the topic had simply willingly kicked out the legs, but upon being questioned, he stated that although rather conscious of the motion as it was happening, it had actually not been triggered by a volitional effort, and even more, that the subjective sensation accompanying the movement was similar to the sensation of the motion following the blow on the tendons with the exception that he was rather mindful that the tendons had not been struck.

2 options presented themselves. Either (1) the topic was in mistake in his introspective observation and had actually voluntarily moved his legs, or (2) the true knee jerk (or a movement resembling it in appearance) had actually been produced by a stimulus aside from the usual one.

(Twitmyer, 1902, p. 24)

Twitmyer turned his research in that instructions. He first performed a series of experiments on the subject who had actually displayed the leg begin apparent action to the bell. During these experiments, the hammers did not always touch the knee after the sounding of the tone. (They were dropped, then captured, in a maneuver the topic couldn’t see.) The topic did not know when the hammers would touch and when they would not. The subject consistently kicked after the tone, even when the hammers did not drop. Twitmyer eliminated other descriptions for the kicking.

Twitmyer then included 5 more subjects. He got constant kicks from one other subject and a couple of kicks from three others. Just one subject failed to kick at all in action to the tone alone in the preliminary of experiments. After executing some procedures to boost the possibility of response to the tone alone, all of the subjects were kicking away at the sound of the tone.

Twitmyer kept in mind later on in a brief journal article because it took in between 150 and 230+ pairings of the bell and the hammer to condition the reflex (Twitmyer, 1902, p. 34). The majority of his subjects had different magnitudes of actions from their left and best legs. Surprisingly, these differences were maintained in the left and ideal leg actions to the bell as well.

Making Mischief

However there was another twist. A minimum of one of the students was covertly attempting to reduce the jerk. These were psychology students, after all. Twitmyer had carefully attempted to conceal the purpose of the experiments where the hammer didn’t always strike, however it must have become relatively apparent. The trainee was interested and fiddled with his reactions, however he wasn’t able to suppress the jerk.

He finally confessed his attempts to Twitmyer, who promptly included it to his dissertation. Some reflexes can be reduced or circumvented to differing degrees. But in the case of the knee jerk reflex there is a method to prevent most intentional modifications of the reflex motion by the subject, and Twitmyer was probably knowledgeable about that. As formerly mentioned, a Hungarian doctor called Jendrassik had actually discovered that asking his clients to clench their teeth and interlock their fingers usually improved the magnitude of the patellar reflex and prevented its suppression. Though he doesn’t describe it by name in his argumentation, Twitmyer was most likely familiar with Jendrassik’s maneuver. Twitmyer points out throughout his argumentation that he required his topics to “clinch their hands” (Twitmyer, 1902, p. 25), as he put it, as they prepared for the hammer tap. Try as he might, the prospective saboteur could not suppress the reflex while following the instructions to “clinch his hands.”

The Jendrassik maneuver Twitmyer’s discovery was a milestone of science however wasn’t acknowledged as such. His thesis was released in 1902, however published by a personal business.

Pavlov published his research on the conditioned reflex in 1903. Twitmyer provided his research study results at a conference of the American Psychological Association in 1904, however had a regrettable place in the schedule. By the time he got to speak, lunch was overdue. Possibly the audience members were even salivating in anticipation. In any case, the noteworthy William James, most likely in reaction to his own rumbling stomach, whisked through the possible concern period and called for a lunch break. Hardly anyone noticed Twitmyer’s discovery.

You ‘d think that setting off the knee jerk reflex without touching the leg would have been viewed with amazement, but no. Although he had a successful profession, Twitmyer never performed another experiment along that line of research study. The majority of us have actually never become aware of Twitmyerian conditioning.

This post was originally published as an article in the IAABC Structure Journal in 2016. Thank you to Tiro Miller for his excellent modifying.

References

De Watteville, A. (1882 ). On reflexes and pseudo-reflexes. British Medical Journal, 1( 1116 ), 736– 737.
Lombard, W.P. (1887 ). The variations of the normal knee-jerk, and their relation to the activity of the central nervous system. The American Journal of Psychology, 1( 1 ), 5– 71.
Mills, C.K. (1899 ). Some points of special interest in the study of the deep reflexes of the lower extremities. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Illness, 26( 3 ), 131– 160.
Twitmyer, E.B. (1902) A research study of the knee jerk (Doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania). Philadelphia: The John C. Winston Company.
Twitmeyer, E. B. (1905 ). Knee-jerks without stimulation of the patellar tendon. Mental Publication, 2, 43– 44.
Twitmyer, E. B. (1974 ). A research study of the knee jerk. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103( 6 ), 1047– 1066.
Zehr, E.P., & Stein, R.B. (1999 ). Interaction of the Jendrassik maneuver with segmental presynaptic inhibition. Experimental brain research, 124, 474– 480.